Comments on: Defining Truth

By: Dan

Dan — Sun, 30 Mar 2008 23:00:58 +0000

“Sigh. So you did accept what wikipedia said? Got it.”

Are you intentionally failing to address my point or was I unclear?

By: Jamie

Jamie — Sun, 30 Mar 2008 20:25:15 +0000

I never knew you could get genital herpes from an orangatan.

By: steve

steve — Sun, 30 Mar 2008 18:38:58 +0000

Sigh. So you did accept what wikipedia said? Got it.

By: Dan

Dan — Sun, 30 Mar 2008 18:04:38 +0000

I recall suggesting wikipedia when you had doubts regarding my assertion that it was both a hormone and a neurotransmitter. If there had been disagreement between my memory of what the book said and what wikipedia said, I would have re-checked the book and if there was indeed a discrepancy between the two sources I would favor the book. You wouldn’t?

By: steve

steve — Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:37:07 +0000

Lol. When we had a question about Oxytocin we went to wikipedia not your neuroscience book.

By: Dan

Dan — Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:34:08 +0000

Yeah, wikipedia most certainly is more truthful than, say, the experts who wrote my neuroscience textbooks.

Then again, I guess you’re entitled to whatever opinion you want about where the hypothalamus is. After all, if there’s no such thing as ‘truth’ or ‘fact’, every opinion must be just as valid as every other.

The retarded part is that you have the audacity to accuse -me- of relativism.