Redistribution Put Towards Infrastructure

Don Surber makes an observation about returns on investments:

You bought Google at $100 and 3 years later is nearing $600 a share? Big deal. Microsoft has gone up 28-fold over the last 20 years? Yawn. You want to make the big bucks? Rent a congressman. Your return on your investment can be as high as $75 for every dollar invested.

Just ask the good folks at PMA Group, a lobbying firm. They sank $1,333,074 into the campaigns last year of 3 Democratic members of the House defense appropriations subcommittee and walked away with $100.5 million in defense earmarks for PMA clients, Roll Call reported.

Remember it’s the democrats that most often argue for taxes increases to put more money into the hands of legislators. Clearly they don’t intend for this kind of outcome but there is a naivety to think that money secured for infrastructure will not eventually be used for political gains.

To reduce this kind of abuse the most simplest solution is to reduce the money legislator have access to by reducing taxation. Democrats advocate developing a complex set of law regulation and controlling lobbyist behavior rather than simply nipping the problem in the bud.

4 Responses to “Redistribution Put Towards Infrastructure”

  1. darwin Says:

    If legislators don’t have money to pay off the people that bribe them, they’ll just use legislation to warp free markets and give them effective monopolies. Personally I’d rather just fight the corruption itself.

  2. steve Says:

    Onerous taxation accompanied with an onerous legal code is preferable to tax reduction. Somehow this translates less restricted markets. Have I stepped into bizzare-o land. Nope. Just the mind of a liberal.

  3. Dan Says:

    Hrm, it’s an interesting coincidence that this article points to corruption related to one of the government’s least-overseen categories of expenditure - defense.

    But then, I guess you think the problem of corruption and waste in the military would completely vanish if we used the draft to replace the civilian contractors in Iraq and elsewhere?

  4. steve Says:

    Nope.

Leave a Reply