One of my images have become the victim of vandalism.
Why would someone desecrate my awesome image of a Model T by putting that ugly ‘N’ on the side of the door. I don’t even want to talk about that but ulgy car, if you can call it that, they attached to the bottom of image.
A new comic posted.
Check out my Model T.
You love it and you know it.
Here an example of satire done properly.
This video shows a gentleman speaking out against the United Nations council charged with Human Rights. He argues, rather convincingly, that this council’s sole purpose is to condemn Israel and has no interest in speaking out against actual human right violations.
The president of the council responds by strongly cautioning the advocator that such language will not be tolerated and subsequent diatribes will be stricken from the record. The president doesn’t actually respond to the criticism. To do this would be to indicate the council is taking serious steps towards relevance by actually defending human rights. Sadly and not ironically, the response is totally in keeping with those interested in eliminating human rights: to censor those that dissent.
But I just can’t resist. Darwin and Bettina you really need to get with the program. Here take a look.
More graphs can be found here.
Yeah i had one of these while walking home. Thunderstorms moving in and it was fun to watch.
The Belmont Club suggests a differentation in treatment of freedom fighters:
No of course not. As currently interpreted the Geneva Conventions only apply to individuals bent on destroying America. Individuals who blow up elementary schools, kidnap children, attack churches and mosques, kill invalids in wheelchairs, plan attacks on skyscrapers in New York, behead journalists, detonate car bombs with children to camouflage their crime, or board jetliners with explosive shoes — all while wearing mufti or even women’s clothing — these are all considered “freedom fighters” of the most principled kind. They and they alone enjoy the protections of the Geneva Convention. As to Americans like Tucker and Menchaca or Israeli Gilad Shalit — or these fifteen British sailors for that matter, it is a case of “what Geneva Convention?” We don’t need no steenkin’ Geneva Convention to try these guys as spies. That’s the way the Human Rights racket works. Don’t go looking for any Geneva Convention in Somalia, Darfur, Basilan or Iran. Try Guantanamo Bay.
Personally, I liked the part where the author reminds us that terrorist comfortable with using children to hide their bombs and then blowing the children up when detonating the bomb enjoy more international outrage and press coverage when arguably their supposed Geneva convention rights are violated. Meanwhile, actual soldiers who most likely find the blatant use and killing of children abhorrent, in fact are denied their Geneva Convention rights and not a peep can be heard from either the MSM or the international community. One might say there is a ‘disproportionate’ response to coverage of actual Geneva Convention violations.
I want to see this movie simply for the trailer.
