But They Are Both Experts
Wednesday, March 12th, 2008Michael Yon makes some observations about two pundits debating Iraq.
This morning I watched the television screen in Mosul as Kagan and Rosen debated Iraq, hosted by Jim Lehrer. Kagan’s statements were entirely consistent with what I see and hear unfolding here. By comparison, Rosen came across as a new Baghdad Bob. While he might be articulate, well dressed and highly credentialed, Rosen’s characterizations of the situation were at best inconsistent with ground-based realities, and at worst completely false . Kagan is worth listening to. Nir Rosen is not.
Being as they are experts, they have access to the truth, and therefore, should agree. Im confused. Someone help me out. How can experts disagree about the truth?
